Comparative study of the drinking water quality assessed from several water sources of the Republic of Moldova
pdf

Keywords

drinking water quality
Prut River aqueduct
aqueduct fed from artesian wells
wells

How to Cite

ZAVTONI, M., MIRON, I., BUCATA, E., BEBIH, V. and GRAMA, O. (2022) “Comparative study of the drinking water quality assessed from several water sources of the Republic of Moldova”, One Health & Risk Management , 3(2S), p. 26. Available at: https://journal.ohrm.bba.md/index.php/journal-ohrm-bba-md/article/view/329 (Accessed: 22June2025).

Abstract

Introduction. Drinking water quality is a major public health issue. In the Republic of Moldova only 35% of the population uses water for drinking purposes from surface water sources, the others use water for this purpose from underground sources, having the highest share of non-compliance with sanitary-chemical and microbiological parameters.

Material and methods. The present study evaluated and analyzed the water quality service of the Prut river aqueduct, the artesian wells aqueduct and the wells, via 11 sanitary-chemical indices. The research was based on hygienic, descriptive, analytical, sanitary-chemical and statistical methods. This study was conducted under the State Program on "Estimating the risk to human health attributed to exposure to priority chemicals in the Republic of Moldova", cipher 20.8000.8007.35.

Results. The analysis of the obtained data showed that the highest values of the summary water mineralization are characteristic for the samples taken from wells constituting 1.36±0.2 g/dm3, as well as for those from the aqueduct fed from the artesian well – 1.15±0.18 g/dm3. Lower values were found in water from Prut River aqueducts, accounting for 0.71±0.08 g/dm3. The concentration of Fe ions was higher in the water from the Prut River aqueduct, showing values of 0.028±0.026 mg/dm3, followed by water from the aqueducts fed from the artesian wells – 0.023±0.018 mg/dm3 and water from the wells – 0.02±0.01 mg/dm3. The maximum values of copper concentrations were recorded in water from wells, which amounted to 0.04±0.03 mg/dm3, followed by water from artesian well-fed aqueducts – 0.034±0.05 mg/dm3 and water from the Prut River aqueducts – 0.027±0.002 mg/dm3. The fluoride content in the investigated sources varied within very small limits from 0.05±0.04 to 0.95±0.6 mg/dm3. The average concentrations of ammonia in the water of the Prut River aqueducts and in the water from the wells showed equal values – 0.14±0.1 mg/dm3, whereas the content of the estimated index was correspondingly 10 times higher in the water from the artesian wells (II 0.06-1.5; p<0.0001). The same legitimacy is characteristic for the nitrogen content, the concentration in the artesian well water being of 0.004±0.006 mg/dm3, corresponding to 13.3 (CI 0.02-0.07; p=0.0003) and 5 (CI 0.02-0.07; p=0.0009) times higher compared to the water content of the Prut River aqueducts and water assessed from the wells. The content of nitrates in the water of the Prut River the aqueducts and in the investigated artesian wells did not differ significantly, being 4.8±2.4 and 4.09±3.1 mg/dm3, respectively and showing low values, while the concentration of this index investigated in the wells corresponded to 13.9 (CI 59.03-75.1; p<0.0001) and 17.2 (CI 59.03-75.1; p<0.0001) or showing higher values compared to the aforementioned sources, thus exceeding the CMA of 50 mg/L.

Conclusions. The water from the river aqueduct is considered the safest source of drinking water supply for the population in terms of its sanitary and chemical parameters.

pdf

|Views: 228| |pdf Downloads: 85|


pdf
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Starting from July 1, 2025, the article processing fee will be 20 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL at the official exchange rate of the National Bank of Moldova). The publication fee for an accepted article will be 150 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL).

Details here:

Processing Fee
A processing fee of 20 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL) will be charged for articles accepted for scientific review by the editorial committee of the One Health and Risk Management journal.
Note: This fee will only be charged if your article has been technically reviewed and accepted.

Publication Fee
Starting from 01.07.2025, a fee of 150 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL) will be charged for articles accepted for publication.
Additionally, authors will bear the cost of English language editing/translation services if the manuscript requires intervention. The fee is 5 EUR (or the equivalent in MDL) per page edited/translated.
The total cost for English editing/translation services will be communicated by the Editorial Board after the manuscript is accepted for publication.

Payment Details:
Payments should be made in MDL to the bank account opened in the name of the Biosafety and Biosecurity Association of the Republic of Moldova.
The invoice will be issued by the end of the month in which the payment was made.

Organization: Biosafety and Biosecurity Association of the Republic of Moldova
Address: 5C A. Cozmescu Street
Fiscal Code: 1017620004120
Bank Code (SWIFT): AGRNMD2X451
IBAN: MD34AG000000022513622370